Page 1 of 1

Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:00 am
by LatakiaLover
When damaged past a certain point, most pipes aren't worth repairing because it's easier (and also less expensive) to replace them.

When a pipe is pricelessly dear to you for personal reasons, though, it isn't only justified, it must be done.

That was the case with this old Dunhill. One of the occasional Dunnies produced without a date stamp, the owner did some Loring-y detective work and concluded it was made in 1936. Since that coincided with the time his grandfather told him he bought it---in the thirties---the age was settled.

What happened to it along the way will never be known, though. The stem was lost outright, and the stummel was covered with a number of symmetrically chewed-away areas, like it fell into a box of spinning gears or something. Two of the gouges were large and deep, but luckily weren't in places that compromised the smoking integrity of the pipe.

Since replacing the lost wood undetectably was the goal, building up the divots until level with briar-dust-filled glue wasn't an option. As much as possible, real wood needed to go back where it belonged because it was the only material that would texture and stain correctly.

So, here is the first of the badly damaged areas (which looks to have been sanded a bit then waxed over) :

Image

-

And here is the second. Wood chipper city. Maybe a psychotic hamster got it(?):

Image

-

This is the hamster's work in side view:

Image

-

Since the missing chunk was a near-perfect semicircle in profile, a cylindrical section was the obvious thing to fill it with. So, a piece of briar was turned on a lathe with a matching radius:

Image

-

It was also used a a tool. Before sectioning, the briar dowel did duty as a mini-rasp by tightly pinching a piece of 150 open grit around it, and the hamster gouge was cleaned up and flattened across the bottom lengthwise so there would be as close to 100% wood-to-wood contact as possible:

Image


The smaller gouge (made by a mouse?) at the end of the shank was similarly deepened slightly and made uniform with a pillar file:

Image

-

Then the lathe-turned cylinder was cut down into a smaller, easier-to-handle piece; and a small flat slab of briar was made to fit the notch on the end of the shank:

Image

-

Then both pieces were glued in place with slow-cure epoxy that was made both black and opaque with pigment designed for the purpose. (A stain has no effect on epoxy, and a shiny, translucent seam would be visible later no matter how the pipe was finished):

Image

-

After letting the epoxy FULLY cure, the little briar blocks were ground down to near-flush:

Image
Image

-

Time for a stem, so that the texturing can be done on leveled material. (Disappear, return w/stem in hand. :lol: I didn't take any photos of that process because everyone has seen stems made a million times. I will say it was made from SEM "superblack" rod, though, which gives old pipes an especially antique-y vibe.)

Also, lucky break: since I happened to have a pre-war shape 137 in my own collection, the stem is an exact match for an original, not a guess. :D

Both wood patch-fills were textured using rotary tools and Secret Old-Repairman Magic. The many smaller gouges found all over the pipe were also blended at this time:

Image

-

Tip for restorers: The best way to get the depth and pattern right---meaning match the surrounding wood---is to check your work with a low angle light. Getting texture right is MUCH easier when shadows are used:

Image

-

Here is the final result:

Image
Image
Image

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:14 am
by Massis
holy crap, that is G(e)orgeous!

You really do have magical skills...

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:43 am
by sandahlpipe
Nice work! Except Dunhill stems never looked that nice.

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 11:17 am
by kamkiel
This is pretty incredible. How long did it take from start to finish?

Kiel

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:23 pm
by Alden
Fantastic work George, thanks for sharing.

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:54 pm
by Sasquatch
What's the big deal, I have to do this to most of my sandblasts..... :lol:

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:27 pm
by caskwith
The only problem there, it looks too good. I have never seen a Dunhill come out of the factory that nice. Maybe if you did the stem work they might just be worth the money they ask.

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:31 pm
by Ocelot55
You're repair work never ceases to amaze me. :thumbsup:

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 8:54 pm
by LatakiaLover
kamkiel wrote:How long did it take from start to finish?
All work including the stem took 9.25 hours.

I know because I charge by the hour these days, so keep track. (Too many gotchas in repair work to do the flat-rate-per-task thing. It's why so many crash and burn, I think.)
caskwith wrote:The only problem there, it looks too good. I have never seen a Dunhill come out of the factory that nice. Maybe if you did the stem work they might just be worth the money they ask.
Funny but true: It KILLS me to make a dead-on, super-exact, fool-the-experts stem because my Inner Perfection Chaser raises holy hell. Almost all Dunnie stems have slightly wonky button/slot alignment, and most of the long taper ones have some dwell time "sag" about 1/3rd of the way from the shank. And don't get me started on their chunky 70's-era stuff. But some collectors insist on things being wrong to be right. I can see their point, especially at re-sell time, but I still hate doing it.

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 12:25 pm
by Revelation
WOW!

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:10 pm
by kamkiel
LatakiaLover wrote:
kamkiel wrote:How long did it take from start to finish?
All work including the stem took 9.25 hours.

I know because I charge by the hour these days, so keep track. (Too many gotchas in repair work to do the flat-rate-per-task thing. It's why so many crash and burn, I think.)

Good for you!  My dad was a mechanic, and all of his jobs were “this fix takes X hours, so its this much money” and he would take a commission on that。 I am pleased to see that you are getting paid by the hour on your jobs。

Kiel

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:07 am
by Joe Hinkle Pipes
truly amazing work. I think George should have his own reality show. Maybe put him in a shop with the Vermont boys and watch the magic unfold. George Abe Steve and J.T in a room should be more than entertaining.

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:47 pm
by d.huber
You never cease to amaze, George! Great work!

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:07 am
by DocAitch
Incredible. I wouldn't have known where to begin, (and wouldn't have). I truly admire your skill and your ethic.
DocAitch.

Re: Replacing Missing Wood---Heavily Damaged Patent Dunhill

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 6:32 pm
by JMG
Witch!